The BTI results from an international analytical collaboration of almost 300 experts in top academic institutions around the world and local reporters in most countries. They all share the goal to detect strengths and weaknesses by comparison and to ?nd good examples for successful political steering. The regional coordinators contribute to the measurement and review process and the analysis of the BTI results in a major fashion. In consultation with the BTI-team, they select their region's country experts, guide, comment and coordinate the preparation of the country reports, calibrate the indicator scores for their respective region and have a most important role in conducting the interregional calibration of the BTI-results. They are also the authors of the regional reports, which form an essential part of each BTI-publication.

Guided by a standardized codebook, country experts assess the extent to which a total of 17 criteria have been met for each of the 129 countries. These experts ground the scores they provide in assessments that comprise the country reports, all of which are available online. A second country expert then reviews these assessments and scores. In a final step, consistency is assured by subjecting each of the 49 individual scores given per country to regional and interregional calibration processes. Standardizing the analytical process in this way makes targeted comparisons of reform policies possible. For more details about the methodology, please visit https://www.bti-project.org/en/about/project/methodology/

For use guidelines, please consult Bertelsmann Stiftung (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Political Participation